ugh boot造句

• :: : : : Mike, the Macquarie Dictionary labeled " ugh boots " as a trademark in 1985, over a decade before Deckers had any interests in the brand.
• The Macquarie dictionary in its revised edition of 1985 ( over ten years before Deckers acquired the mark ) had a listing for  ugh boot which read as follows :  ugh boot, n . a fleecy-lined boot with an untanned upper.
• :: : : : : Factchk, I hope you noted in that entry the word " ALSO " before the part that said " ugg boot trademark "-This is NOT the Macquarie Dictionary " labeling ugh boots as a trademark " it's acknowledging the existence of an " Ugg Boots ( TM ) " in ADDITION to the generic term.
• *From the original court transcript ( Page 10 ) : " The evidence overwhelming supports the proposition that the terms UGH BOOT ( S ), UG BOOT ( S ) and UGG BOOT ( S ) are interchangeably used to describe a specific style of sheepskin boot and are the first and most natural way in which to describe these goods which should innocently come to the minds of people making this particular style of sheepskin boot.
• The officer who heard the case stated that the " evidence overwhelmingly supports the proposition that the terms ( ugg, ugh and ug boots ) are interchangeably used to describe a specific style of sheepskin boot and are the first and most natural way in which to describe these goods . " In 2006 Uggs-N-Rugs won the right to use the term UGG BOOT / S and variations such as UGH BOOT / S within Australia.
• The name Ugg / UGG was determined to be generic after the Registrar of Trade Marks found that registration did not confer " rights in the generic term, or terms, from which it is derived " and that the identity of the various trade marks " derive from the hyphenated nature of the expression . " Therefore, " UGH boots, UG boots " and " UGG boots " ( " or other variations " ) without hyphens are all generic terms in Australia.